Home
About Us
Members
News Archives
Activity Reports
IPEN/POPs
Pesticides
Dioxins, PCBs and other wastes
Other Toxins
Community Monitoring
Socio-Political Context
Contact Us
Links
Heal Toxics is a member of the International POPs Elimination Network

This website provides resources on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) such as pesticides, dioxins, PCBs, and wastes. Valuable examples of community monitoring of health and environmental impacts of toxic chemicals are also furnished.

Further, there is an entire section devoted to chemical safety in its proper socio-political context or in relation to issues such as globalization and people's empowerment.

 

Parliament backs new EU law on toxic chemicals

By Jeff Mason, Reuters

STRASBOURG, France - The European Parliament, seeking to protect the public from toxic substances, backed a landmark new law on Thursday that has pitted Europe's chemicals industry against environmental groups for years.

Lawmakers voted in favour of an amended bill on Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals (REACH), designed to make companies prove that substances in everyday products such as cars, computers or paint are safe.

The properties of roughly 30,000 chemicals produced or imported in the European Union would have to be registered with a central agency. Those of highest concern, such as carcinogens, would require testing and authorisation to be used.

The EU legislature voted 407-155 for the legislation with 41 abstentions. The rules must still be agreed by EU member states, possibly as early as next month, and may have to come back to parliament before they can become a law.

The amendments approved included a compromise that substantially reduced the number of chemicals requiring testing.

Lawmakers also supported a measure that would force firms to substitute safe chemicals for hazardous ones when alternatives are available.

GREENS DISAPPOINTED

Environmental and consumer activists hailed the vote on substitution for dangerous substances but criticised the decision to reduce the number of chemicals that require testing.

"A REACH adopted on this basis will not deliver the health and environment protection the public needs, as it would leave thousands of chemicals without basic toxicity data," seven groups including Greenpeace and WWF said in a joint statement.

A majority of members of the Greens parliamentary group also voted against it, said Swedish member Carl Schlyter.

"Now the REACH registration phase is so weak, we will not know what safe alternatives are on the market because we will test much fewer chemicals," he told Reuters.

Industry had supported lowering the number of chemicals requiring tests to ease the burden on smaller firms.

The European Commission, original author of REACH, forecasts it will cost the chemical industry 2.3 billion euros over 11 years. Total costs to industry -- including sectors like metals, textiles, electronics and cars -- are estimated between 2.8 billion and 5.2 billion euros.

Germany, Europe's largest chemicals producer with giants like BASF and Bayer, secured a delay in a decision by member states due this month, but Britain, which holds the EU presidency, aims for political agreement this year.

The United States and African nations have said REACH would disrupt trade and hurt their industries.

İheal toxics, 2003
clock javascript courtesy of dynamicdrive.com

Chile: Poison Victims Demand Pesticide Restrictions (by IPS)

Protests mark anniversary of Bhopal tragedy (by AFP)

U.S. wrests large exemption from international pesticide ban (by AP)

Canada: Top court backs pesticide ban (by Toronto Star)

Parliament backs new EU law on toxic chemicals (by Reuters)

Scientists Identify Corporate Structure as Bad for Public Health (by PANNA)

China: Education urged on persistent pollutants (by Xinhuanet)